Lean, informalized

Nielsen & Chuang · Chapter 8, Quantum noise and quantum operations · p. 381

Exercise 8.21 - An oscillator coupled to a vacuum mode loses its quanta as under amplitude damping

Amplitude damping from a beam splitter coupling.

Hover over a blue or green term in the text, or a node in the graph, to find it in the other. Select it to read its declaration both in Lean and in words.

The Exercise

A harmonic oscillator with annihilation operator aa, the system, exchanges quanta with a second oscillator, its environment, with annihilation operator bb. The coupling a†b+b†aa^\dagger b + b^\dagger a moves one quantum at a time between the two, as a beam splitter does with two modes of light; acting for a time, it gives the joint unitary U(θ)=exp⁡[−iθ(a†b+b†a)]U(\theta) = \exp[-i\theta(a^\dagger b + b^\dagger a)], the angle θ\theta being the coupling strength times the time. The environment starts in its vacuum |0⟩|0\rangle. Tracing it out in its number basis |k⟩|k\rangle leaves the system with an operation whose elements are Ek=⟨k|U(θ)|0⟩E_k = \langle k|U(\theta)|0\rangle, one for each number kk of quanta the environment has taken up. The exercise is to compute them and to recognize in them the elements of amplitude damping, with γ=sin⁡2θ\gamma = \sin^2\theta the probability that a single quantum is lost.

The Coupling in Each Sector

The coupling conserves the total number of quanta, so U(θ)U(\theta) acts separately on each sector of nn quanta in all. The coupling matrix GnG_n of that sector is the (n+1)×(n+1)(n+1)\times(n+1) matrix of a†b+b†aa^\dagger b + b^\dagger a in the basis |n−j⟩|j⟩|n-j\rangle|j\rangle, j=0,…,nj = 0, \dots, n, of states with jj quanta in the environment; it is tridiagonal, with (Gn)j,j+1=(Gn)j+1,j=(j+1)(n−j),j=0,…,n−1,(G_n)_{j,j+1} = (G_n)_{j+1,j} = \sqrt{(j+1)(n-j)}, \qquad j = 0, \dots, n-1,(1)✦ and zeros elsewhere. The sector propagator Un(θ)U^n(\theta), the evolution of the sector of nn quanta, is the matrix exponential of −iθGn-i\theta G_n, Un(θ)=e−iθGn.U^n(\theta) = e^{-i\theta G_n}.(2)✦

The Beam Splitter Elements

The amplitude for kk of nn quanta to pass into the environment is cn,k(θ)=(nk)cos⁡n−kθ(−isin⁡θ)k,c_{n,k}(\theta) = \sqrt{\binom{n}{k}}\,\cos^{n-k}\theta\,(-i\sin\theta)^k,(3) and the beam splitter element Ek(θ)E_k(\theta) is the operator on the oscillator’s state space that takes |n⟩|n\rangle to |n−k⟩|n-k\rangle with this amplitude, Ek(θ)=∑n≥kcn,k(θ)|n−k⟩⟨n|.E_k(\theta) = \sum_{n \ge k} c_{n,k}(\theta)\,|n-k\rangle\langle n|.(4)

Amplitude Damping

Under amplitude damping each quantum of the oscillator is lost independently, with probability γ\gamma, and kk of nn quanta are lost with the binomial probability pn,k(γ)=(nk)(1−γ)n−kγk.p_{n,k}(\gamma) = \binom{n}{k}(1-\gamma)^{n-k}\gamma^k.(5)✦ The damping element Dk(γ)D_k(\gamma) is the operator on the oscillator’s state space whose amplitudes are the square roots of these probabilities, Dk(γ)=∑n≥kpn,k(γ)|n−k⟩⟨n|.D_k(\gamma) = \sum_{n \ge k} \sqrt{p_{n,k}(\gamma)}\,|n-k\rangle\langle n|.(6)✦

The Claim

Theorem 1. Let θ\theta be a real angle. The beam splitter elements satisfy the completeness relation ∑kEk(θ)†Ek(θ)=I.\sum_k E_k(\theta)^\dagger E_k(\theta) = I.(7)✦ For k≤nk \le n, the matrix element of Ek(θ)E_k(\theta) from |n⟩|n\rangle to |n−k⟩|n-k\rangle is the entry of the sector propagator in row kk and column 00, ⟨n−k|Ek(θ)|n⟩=Un(θ)k0.\langle n-k|E_k(\theta)|n\rangle = U^n(\theta)_{k0}.(8)✦ For every kk, each matrix element of Ek(θ)E_k(\theta) in the number basis has the modulus of the same matrix element of the damping element at γ=sin⁡2θ\gamma = \sin^2\theta, |⟨r|Ek(θ)|s⟩|=|⟨r|Dk(sin⁡2θ)|s⟩|for all r,s.|\langle r|E_k(\theta)|s\rangle| = |\langle r|D_k(\sin^2\theta)|s\rangle| \qquad \text{for all } r, s.(9)✦ For 0≤γ≤10 \le \gamma \le 1, the damping elements satisfy the completeness relation ∑kDk(γ)†Dk(γ)=I.\sum_k D_k(\gamma)^\dagger D_k(\gamma) = I.(10)✦

What Is Checked

The claim is stated over two families of operation elements: the beam splitter elements Ek(θ)E_k(\theta) of (4), with their amplitudes (3), and the damping elements Dk(γ)D_k(\gamma) of (6), with the loss probabilities (5).

Of these constructions the library proves that both families are complete, (7) and (10), so that each is the set of elements of a trace preserving operation on the oscillator.