Lean, informalized

Nielsen & Chuang · Chapter 12, Quantum information theory · p. 575

Theorem 12.13 - Eigenvalue majorization between Hermitian matrices and random unitary mixing

Majorization as a mixture of unitary conjugates.

Hover over a blue or green term in the text, or a node in the graph, to find it in the other. Select it to read its declaration both in Lean and in words.

The Exercise

Let HH and KK be Hermitian operators on the same state space of dimension dd, written as d×dd \times d matrices. Choose unitaries U1,…,UmU_1, \dots, U_m and probabilities p1,…,pmp_1, \dots, p_m, conjugate KK by each unitary and average with those weights. When KK is a density operator, the average ∑jpjUjKUj†\sum_j p_j U_j K U_j^\dagger is the state of a system prepared in KK after a unitary UjU_j, chosen with probability pjp_j, has acted on it and the choice has been forgotten. Theorem 12.13 decides which operators HH arise from KK in this way, by a condition on the eigenvalues of the two operators alone: majorization.

Majorization

Let y→\vec{y} be a real vector with dd entries y1,…,ydy_1, \dots, y_d. For 0≤k≤d0 \le k \le d, the largest sum of kk entries of y→\vec{y} is Lk(y→)=max|s|=k∑i∈syi,L_k(\vec{y}) = \max_{|s| = k} \sum_{i \in s} y_i,(1)✦ the maximum running over all sets ss of kk indices.

A real vector x→\vec{x} with dd entries is majorized by y→\vec{y}, written x→≺y→\vec{x} \prec \vec{y}, when the two have the same total and the entries of x→\vec{x} in any set ss of indices sum to no more than the largest sum of as many entries of y→\vec{y}: ∑i=1dxi=∑i=1dyi,∑i∈sxi≤L|s|(y→)for every s⊆{1,…,d}.\sum_{i=1}^{d} x_i = \sum_{i=1}^{d} y_i, \qquad \sum_{i \in s} x_i \le L_{|s|}(\vec{y}) \quad \text{for every } s \subseteq \{1, \dots, d\}.(2)✦

A Hermitian d×dd \times d matrix HH is majorized by a Hermitian d×dd \times d matrix KK, written H≺KH \prec K, when the vector λ→(H)\vec{\lambda}(H) of the eigenvalues of HH, each repeated as often as its multiplicity, is majorized by the vector λ→(K)\vec{\lambda}(K) of the eigenvalues of KK: H≺K⇔λ→(H)≺λ→(K).H \prec K \iff \vec{\lambda}(H) \prec \vec{\lambda}(K).(3)✦

The Claim

Theorem 1. Let HH and KK be Hermitian d×dd \times d matrices. Then H≺KH \prec K if and only if there are finitely many probabilities p1,…,pmp_1, \dots, p_m, nonnegative and summing to one, and as many unitary matrices U1,…,UmU_1, \dots, U_m such that H=∑j=1mpjUjKUj†.H = \sum_{j=1}^{m} p_j \, U_j K U_j^\dagger.(4)✦

What Is Checked

The claim is stated over the majorization of Hermitian matrices (3), built from the vector majorization (2) and the largest sums (1), and over mixtures (4) of finitely many unitary conjugates of KK. What the library proves about these constructions is the equivalence of the theorem, in both directions, for Hermitian matrices of every size.