Lean, informalized

Nielsen & Chuang · Chapter 11, Entropy and information · p. 518

Exercise 11.20 - An unread measurement of a projector and its complement is an equal mixture of the identity and a reflection

Pinching by a projector as a mixture of two unitaries.

Hover over a blue or green term in the text, or a node in the graph, to find it in the other. Select it to read its declaration both in Lean and in words.

The Exercise

A quantum system is in a state ρ\rho, and PP is an orthogonal projector on its state space, a self adjoint operator with P2=PP^2 = P. A measurement with the two projectors PP and 1−P1 - P, whose outcome is then forgotten, leaves the system in the state PρP+(1−P)ρ(1−P)P\rho P + (1-P)\rho(1-P), the pinching of ρ\rho by PP. The exercise is to show that a fair coin does the same: on heads nothing is done, on tails the system evolves under the unitary 1−2P1 - 2P, and the resulting mixture is the pinching.

A Quantum System

A quantum system SS is a physical object whose state space is a finite dimensional complex Hilbert space.✦ A state ρ\rho of SS is a positive operator of unit trace on the state space of SS, pure or mixed.✦

A unitary UU of SS is an operator on the state space of SS with U†U=UU†=1U^\dagger U = U U^\dagger = 1; it describes a closed evolution of SS.✦ The evolution of a state ρ\rho of SS under UU is the state ρ↦UρU†.\rho \mapsto U \rho \, U^\dagger .(1)✦ The identity evolution of SS is the unitary 11, under which (1) leaves every state as it is.✦

The Reflection

For an orthogonal projector PP on the state space of SS, the reflection RPR_P of SS determined by PP is the unitary of SS with operator RP=1−2P.R_P = 1 - 2P .(2)✦ It reverses every vector in the range of PP and fixes every vector in the range of 1−P1 - P.

The Claim

Theorem 1. Let SS be a quantum system, PP an orthogonal projector on its state space and ρ\rho a state of SS. Then the pinching of ρ\rho by PP is the equal mixture of the evolutions (1) of ρ\rho under the identity evolution and under the reflection (2): PρP+(1−P)ρ(1−P)=121ρ1†+12RPρRP†.P\rho P + (1-P)\rho(1-P) = \tfrac12 \, 1 \, \rho \, 1^\dagger + \tfrac12 \, R_P \, \rho \, R_P^\dagger .(3)✦

What Is Checked

The claim (3) is stated over a state ρ\rho of a quantum system SS and an orthogonal projector PP on its state space, with the two terms of the mixture given as the evolutions (1) of ρ\rho under the identity evolution and under the reflection RPR_P of (2).

About these constructions the library proves that RPR_P is a unitary, since it is self adjoint and P2=PP^2 = P gives RP2=1R_P^2 = 1, and that conjugating a state by a unitary gives a state. Each evolution (1) is therefore a state of SS, and the right side of (3) is an equal mixture of two states.